Inclusive AbundanceInclusive Abundance
Abundance in Action
  • Published Work
  • Abundance Landscape
Back
Institutional Innovation
03/24/2025

Innovation: Artificial Intelligence Talent (Public Sector)

By Joshua Seawell, Karl Smith, Inclusive Abundance Initiative
Innovation: Artificial Intelligence Talent (Public Sector)

Sector: 23.7% of GDP (Federal Gov’t) 
Estimated Cost: $1B / ~0% of federal budget
Political Challenge: Low  


I. Overview

Artificial intelligence technology promises to fortify our national security and put unprecedented capabilities at the fingertips of public agencies. But the U.S. public sector has a technical talent problem, putting the technology partially out of reach and our security, society, and growth at risk. Outdated federal hiring practices and policies are to blame, and updating them is essential for bringing government into the modern age.  

II. Problem 

More than half of agency staff feel their agencies are underequipped to “build, manage, or procure” artificial intelligence.1 

With a strong and permanent base of artificial intelligence talent, the federal government could:  

  • plan and pursue preliminary use cases for AI, which may involve managing highly technical contracts 

  • advance smart rules for the technology’s use in various regulatory domains, especially to head off existential risk 

  • equip itself for a new world of cyberdefense 

  • make better use of programs that bring AI experts into government temporarily 

Agencies are aware of these needs, planning hundreds of AI roles or “AI-enabling” roles (the more common). The Department of Defense is the largest potential employer, seeking to hire 9,000 people in AI-relevant roles by FY 2026.2  

Outdated hiring policies undermine this talent base. Attracting and retaining any technical talent is difficult due to pay gaps with the private sector. Many top professionals participate in programs that offer time-limited roles in government instead. But hiring these experts is a challenge even when they do want to work in the public sector, because the conventional, “competitive” hiring process places low weight on demonstrated expertise.3  

Public Sector Tools to Hire Outstanding Talent: 4, 5, 6

Common workarounds of the federal government's conventional, “competitive” hiring process include: 

  • "excepted" roles with unique qualifications, hiring, and pay— extremely common, accounting for about half of today’s hires 

  • special “competitive” authorities, like Direct Hire authority, which skips the infamous “ranking and rating” process and gives hiring managers greater discretion 

  • “noncompetitive” authorities, which offer streamlined hiring for individuals from eligible categories like students and veterans 

  • subject matter tests that screen for a basic level of expertise, putting a higher premium on skills 

Each requires approval from OPM.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) extended wide-ranging excepted service and direct hire authorities for AI roles in 2023 and 2024. It has also encouraged cross-agency pooled hiring, which promises to reduce costly redundancies, and offered guidance to help agencies do skills-based hiring.7 This showed some success in the AI Talent Surge, which brought 250 AI professionals into government.8  

Agencies are emerging as a bottleneck. The full OPM hiring toolkit has gone underutilized due to risk-aversion and compliance fears from agency HR offices.9 This is itself partly a result of OPM’s and agency watchdogs’ typically conservative approach to hiring10 — a culture of slow approvals and frequent rejections when agencies step outside the lines — and some real and imagined compliance risks that have become agency conventional wisdom.11  

III. Recommendations 

Federal talent is a practice problem, not (just) a policy one. To build a stronger technical workforce, OPM must (counterintuitively) create a new culture of greater agency autonomy. This means educating agencies about the tools at their disposal and exercising a lighter touch when reviewing agency hiring actions. While this expanded autonomy itself should cause shifts in their hiring strategies, agencies must be offered additional incentives by OPM and political appointees to use it to its fullest.

To complement these efforts, Congress can expand rotational programs, like Presidential Innovation Fellows, so that top talent can move back and forth between the public and private sectors with more ease. At a higher level of ambition, Congress could revamp the conventional hiring process to be more skills-based.  

IV. Risks and Politics 

The bulk of recommended changes can be conducted without much controversy within the executive branch. Legal and political opposition from groups representing veterans (who are privileged by the conventional process) may present a challenge.  


This write-up is one installment in our Abundance explainer series. Each installment of the series synthesizes a viewpoint on a topic from various value-aligned experts, including many of our Abundance Innovators. To see the other installments, click here.

1 AI and Talent Task Force, Increasing AI Capacity Across The Federal Government
2 Ibid
3 Allie Harris and Peter Bonner, Many Chutes and Few Ladders in the Federal Hiring Process
4 Jason Miller, Nearly half of all civilian feds are new hires since 2019
5 Partnership for Public Service, Rapid Reinforcements
6 US Digital Service, Understanding the SME-QA Process
7 Office of Personnel Management, OPM Highlights its Key Actions under… AI Executive Order
8 Office of Personnel Management, Guidance to Support Cross-Government Application Sharing
9 The security clearance process also emerged as a bottleneck and deserves further consideration. 
10 Niskanen Center, The How We Need Now
11 Expert interviews suggested a prevalent belief, which practitioners found dubious, that skills-based hiring could conflict with EEOC compliance

Related Innovator

Jenny Mattingley
Jenny Mattingley

Related Content

  1. We Can’t Build Things if We Don’t Fix Government Hiring
    Commentary

    We Can’t Build Things if We Don’t Fix Government Hiring

    Visit Website
Item 1 of 1
Inclusive Abundance

Contact Details

PO Box 5064
Greenwich, CT 06831
info@inclusiveabundance.org

© 2025 Inclusive Abundance Initiative. This is the website of the Inclusive Abundance Initiative, a 501(c)(3) organization (EIN: 93-3864714). All rights reserved.
For more information about Inclusive Abundance Action, our affiliated 501(c)(4), reach out to info@inclusiveabundance.org
Terms of UsePrivacy Policy